Legal Opinion

United States v. Thornhill

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 28, 2014No. Case No. 11-CR-958 (KMK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:

On June 20, 2012, Defendant Mobutu Thornhill (“Defendant”) was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), in a trial before this Court. Defendant now brings this Motion for a New Trial pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, alleging that his trial counsel’s ineffectiveness rendered his trial fundamentally unfair, in violation of the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. For the reasons given herein, Defendant’s Motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Prior to his…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Chavez v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. Murad NersesianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Polanco v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  2. Vilar v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API