Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Schonts

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided December 27, 1983No. 83-442PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OXBERGER, Chief Judge.

The petitioner-wife, trying to collect a child support arrearage under the parties’ 1977 dissolution decree, started proceedings to garnish money the husband had deposited in a bank. The husband filed a motion to quash garnishment, alleging that the money in his bank account was exempt from garnishment because it all derived from either social security disability benefits or workers’ compensation benefits. The trial court sustained this motion to quash garnishment, and the wife has appealed. We reverse.

Petitioner-wife contends the “motion to quash garnishment” was not a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Pride v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Bagnall v. Iowa-Des Moines National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  4. In Re the Marriage of McMorrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. Luedecke v. LuedeckeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DeTienne v. DeTienneDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  2. Smith-Porter v. Iowa Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. Mariche v. MaricheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. Serrano v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1986
  5. Bruning v. SwipiesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API