Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Lowrie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 26, 1951No. 35,343Published

1DissentThomas Gallagher, Justice

I am of the opinion that the four questions certified to this court should be definitely answered as follows:

Do the statutes exempt defendant from prosecution for the offense stated in the indictment?

*88The statutes of Minnesota, in my opinion, exempt defendant from prosecution for the offense stated in the indictment, unless it be held that he has waived such exemption. M. S. A. 613.16 provides :

“Every person offending against any * * * law relating to bribery shall be a competent witness against another so offending, and may be compelled to attend and testify upon any trial, hearing,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. United States Ex Rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner of ImmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Raffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API