Legal Opinion
Rosell Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 12, 1957No. Appeal, No. 109PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Wright, J.,
Harry F. Rosell was an employe of Abbotts Dairies, working on the night shift. On June 15, 1956, he terminated his employment, alleging as his reason that he could not sleep in the daytime. His application for benefits was disallowed by the Bureau, Referee, and Board of Review under Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law. Act of December 5, 1936, P. L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. 802(b). This appeal followed.
It is appellant’s position that work on the night shift was not suitable for him because of a service-connected nervous condition. However, he was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Suska Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Suska Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Pusey Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Goldstein Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Davis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Zinman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Mollo Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Busfield Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Junda Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.