Legal Opinion
Barnett Bank v. Chiatovich
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1925No. 2658PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Ducker, C. J.:
The plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the banking business at the town of Wasco, State of Oregon, and brought this action against the defendants as the owner and holder of their promissory note. It is alleged in the complaint, as amended, that:
“Before December 27, 1919, the plaintiff, for a valuable consideration, purchased said promissory note from H. B. Thornberry in the course of its business, and in good faith.”
It is also alleged in the complaint that at all times and dates mentioned therein—
“The defendants were and are the joint owners of and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kimbro v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Dunton v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Osburn v. FarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Gilbert v. WhiddenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841
3Cited by5 opinions
- A.D. v. Credit One Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Wenzel MacHinery Rental & Sales Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Hobbs v. Virginia National BankCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
- John Deere Plow Co. v. KlaurensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Huffman v. KahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934