Legal Opinion

Kimbro v. Bullitt

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1860PublishedCited by 24 opinions

This case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the middle district of Tennessee. The suit was brought upon three bills of exchange, which were accepted and paid by Bullitt, Miller, & Co., the drawees, for the accommodation of the drawers, Dement, Kirnbro, & Sons, of. which firm Joseph Kirnbro was a partner. This action was brought by Bullitt, Miller, & Co., against Joseph Kirnbro alone.

Read the full summary

This case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the middle district of Tennessee. The suit was brought upon three bills of exchange, which were accepted and paid by Bullitt, Miller, & Co., the drawees, for the accommodation of the drawers, Dement, Kirnbro, & Sons, of. which firm Joseph Kirnbro was a partner. This action was brought by Bullitt, Miller, & Co., against Joseph Kirnbro alone. The place of business of the firm of Dement, Kirnbro, & Sous, was in Mississippi. Kirnbro resided in Tennessee, and therefore was sued there. The defence set up in…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clifford

This case comes before the court upon a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the middle district of Tennessee. It was an action of assumpsit brought by the present defendants against the plaintiff in error, to recover the amount of three several bills of exchange, particularly described in the declaration. As exhibited in the transcript, the several bills of exchauge bear date at Lexington, in-the State of Mississippi, on the second day of April, 1858, and purport respectively to have been drawn and addressed to the original plaintiffs by one Morgan McAfee, and by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Winship v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Pease v. ColeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  3. Dowling v. Exchange Bank of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Dow v. Northern RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
  5. Hanson v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API