Stiles v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
A jury convicted Justin Brooks Stiles of the first- and second-degree murder of Heinz Moorman. He was sentenced to life in prison. In this appeal Stiles argues that the postconviction court abused its discretion in two regards: first, it denied relief based on the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on three lesser-included offenses; and second, it denied relief on two evidentiary rulings of the trial court. We affirm the district court.
Appellant Justin Brooks Stiles was nineteen years old when he and four of his friends attempted to rob eighteen-year-old Heinz…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. LeinweberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. LoebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Inquiry into the Conduct of KarasovSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Darek Jon Nelson v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. Al-NaseerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.