Legal Opinion

United States v. Freddie Williams

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 28, 1972No. 72-1269PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Freddie Williams was convicted upon trial by jury of two counts of an indictment alleging sale of heroin,1 and he appeals. We affirm.

The appellant’s principal contention on this appeal is that the trial court erred in not ordering a competency hearing at the time of trial, to determine whether he was incompetent to stand trial because of narcotic addiction.2

The United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 4244, provides for a competency hearing *820on motion of the United States Attorney, of the defendant, or on the court’s own motion. At the trial of this case, however, no request was made for a competency…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Jerome Atilus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Lawrence W. Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. Oscar Roca-AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Robert LyonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Demetri Thor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. BevansDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. United States v. Andrew WingoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API