Legal Opinion

Texas Midland R. Co. v. Hurst

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 20, 1924No. 2922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Hunt County; Newman Phillips, Judge. Action by B. B. Hurst against the Texas Midland Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

In February, 1921, the ap-pellee’ was employed as a section foreman in the service of the appellant. On the 5th. day of that month he was injured while on a motor car used by him in the performance of his duties. He later filed this suit and recovered a judgment for $2,000 as damages. The car was the private property of the ap-pellee, but he was required to use it in going over the railroad track. Repairs to the car, when needed, were usually made in the railroad shops by the agents of the appellant.

As a ground of liability the appellee alleged and proved that the car had previously been sent…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Jones v. Guilford Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Dodson v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Goodson v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API