Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Shields

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1926No. Appeal 283PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

We are obliged to quash this appeal because it was taken before a nolle prosequi had actually been entered, and hence was premature. The order of the lower court contained a direction to enter a nolle prosequi in the event that certain things were done, but the record fails to show that it was ever actually entered.

To avoid further and unnecessary controversy, however, we deem it proper to say that the right of the court to enter a nolle prosequi against the protest of the district attorney, was denied by this court in Com. v. Reed, 65 Pa. Superior Ct. 91, a case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hester v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  2. Commonwealth v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. BrokawDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1945
  2. Hammers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. State Ex Rel. Ronan v. StevensArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. LordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Thor v. Ashe, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API