Legal Opinion
Scholing v. O'Conner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The briefs of the appeUant contain accusations and criticisms directed against defendants’ trial counsel which we deem to be wholly unjustifiable. The conduct of the appeUant’s counsel in this respect does not meet with our approval, and we, therefore, direct that his briefs be removed from the files of the court. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Baylis v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- In re the Accounting of MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965