Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Moran

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 25, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents payable out of the estate. Appellant’s reply brief is stricken and expunged from the records of this court. Memorandum: Whether the issue as decided was one of law or fact, we agree that the conclusion reached by the Surrogate was correct. Appellant’s reply brief is permeated with accusations and criticisms directed against respondents’ counsel and the Surrogate which we deem to be wholly unjustifiable. It should, therefore, be expunged from the records of this court. (Scholing v. O’Connor, 209 App. Div. 839; Baylis v. Wood, 246 App. Div.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baylis v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Scholing v. O'ConnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maestracci v. Helly Nahmad Gallery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API