Colarossi v. Anderson Concrete Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGkcetith, J.
When the conduct of a party is once ascertained, the question whether it came up to the standard of reasonable care prescribed by the law ordinarily must be decided as a matter of fact. Only in clear eases can it be ruled on as a matter of law.
At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case, was there not presented a question of whether the defendant, under all the attending circumstances, exercised ordinary care toward the plaintiff ?
The driver of defendant’s truck, who was thoroughly familiar with the construction area in the project by having previously made other deliveries of concrete, testified,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Lisle v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Tanzi v. New York Central R. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
- Rockey v. ErnestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.