Legal Opinion

Mirko Carrea v. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 5, 2012No. 11-15263UnpublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Mirko Carrea (“Carrea”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Second Amended Class Action Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The complaint alleges that Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream, Inc. (“Dreyer’s”) violated four state consumer protection laws: (1) Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. and Prof.Code § 17200 et seq.; (2) False Advertising Law, Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code § 17500 et seq.; (3) California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1750, et seq.; and (4) New York General Business Law § 349. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Degelmann v. Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In re Adobe Systems, Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Shavonda Hawkins v. the Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Anderson v. Jamba Juice Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. Krommenhock v. Post Foods, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  5. Cardenas v. NBTY, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API