Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cotleur v. Danziger

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 22, 1994No. 75876Published

1DissentRobertson, Judge

Prior to 1988, Rule 74.05 provided:

If a defendant shall fail to file his answer or other pleading within the time prescribed by law or the rules of practice of the court, and serve a copy thereof upon the adverse party, or his attorney, when the same is required, an interlocutory judgment shall be given against him in default.

Judicial application of the prior rule uniformly held that where a defendant filed an answer, a trial court’s judgment rested on the merits and was hot a default judgment even where the defendant failed to appear for trial. See Ward v. Davis, 701 S.W.2d 192 (Mo.App.1985)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sprung v. Negwer Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Ozark Mountain Timber Products, Inc. v. RedusMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Herrin v. StrausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Schulte v. Venture Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Ward v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API