Woodworth v. Chesbrough
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
This is a cross writ of error taken by Frank T. Wood-worth, defendant in error in . No. 179, ante, 72, and is presented on the record in that case.,
As stated in the opinion in No. 179, the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the judgment obtained by Woodworth against Chesbrough on the ground that certain amounts computed in the judgment were not sustained by the evidence and, therefore, remanded the case for a new trial. Thereupon Woodworth moved to modify the opinion and judgment in such manner as to permit him to remit such part of it as the court thought was not supported by the evidence and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Koenigsberger v. Richmond Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
3Cited by33 opinions
- Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fiacco v. City of RensselaerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Lawrence Hill, (90-3923), Cross-Appellant (90-3826) v. Ronald C. Marshall, Terry Morris, (90-3803), Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Fiacco v. City Of RensselaerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Mattox v. News Syndicate Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.