Farmers Implement Co. v. Sandberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant moved to vacate a judgment entered against him by default in the district court for Kittson county. From an order denying the motion to vacate, Grindeland, J., defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Appeal by the defendant from an order denying his motion to set aside a judgment for want of jurisdiction.
1. The summons was personally served upon the defendant on February 12, .1915. .Hpon this service judgment by default was entered. By G. S., 1913, § 9412, subd. 6 (R. L. 1905, § 5514, subd. 6), the word “holiday” includes, among other.days, “Lincoln’s birthday, February 12.” This subdivision of. the statute provides: “No public business *390shall be transacted on those days, except in cases of necessity, nor shall any civil process be served thereon.” The question is whether a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Malmgren v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Lockway v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- City of St. Paul v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Kulberg v. Fraternal UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Crisp v. GochnourSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schilling v. OdlebakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Tharp v. TharpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Lebens v. HarbeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Chapman v. FoshaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.