Gould v. Van Horne
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action brought by the plaintiff as executor of the last will and testament of Mary M. Shaw, deceased, to recover the sum of $17,250.66, alleged to be due from said defendant to the estate of said deceased upon his promissory note. The defendant’s amended answer set up that there was no consideration for said note, and further set forth the circumstances under which the note had been signed as the basis for the defendant’s claim that it was executed under a mutual mistake of the parties.
The facts of the case as developed at the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Young v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Crocker v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Estate of Beatty v. Western College of ToledoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Doty v. . WillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Calkins v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fender v. FoustMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- University of Vermont v. Wilbur's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Fargason v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
- Connelly v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. CottrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.