Legal Opinion

W. S. Quinby Co. v. Estey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1915PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The plaintiff, who was a wholesale dealer in tea and coffee, hired from the defendant, who was a teamster, a horse, wagon and driver for the sum of $29 a week to deliver the merchandise of the plaintiff. The driver, Day, was paid by the defendant, and, while he was carrying seventeen chests of tea belonging to the plaintiff from the Metropolitan Steamship Company’s wharf to the warehouse of the plaintiff, they were lost. This action is to recover their value. The jury found specifically that the tea was lost through Day’s carelessness and that he was not the servant or employee of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. TowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Shepard v. JacobsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Oulighan v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Delory v. BlodgettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Tornroos v. R. H. White Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Scribner's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. McNamara v. . LeipzigNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Comerford's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Rockwell v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. L. & S. Construction Co. v. State Accident FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API