Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Desiderio v. Connolly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 7, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crouch, J.:

By the returns to an alternative writ of mandamus certain issues of fact were joined herein. When the cause came on for trial before a jury, respondents moved for a reference. The motion was denied. After the trial had progressed for two days, the court, of its own motion, against the opposition of relators, made an order of reference. The appeal is from that order.

Appellants claim (1) that the court had no power in a mandamus proceeding to make a compulsory order of reference; and (2) that even though it had such power, the issues here did not involve a long account.

1. Whether the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Noyes & Pettingill v. HewittNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. People v. Commissioners of Highways of City of HudsonNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  4. Lyman v. Gramercy ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. People Ex Rel. Aspinwall v. Supervisors of RichmondNew York Court of Appeals · 1863

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Caspian Realty, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Estate of BachmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  3. Holm v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. H. E. Benjamin Co. v. NottinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API