Legal Opinion

Holm v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stephens,

Official Beferee. Upon the application of the petitioner at Special Term for a peremptory order of mandamus *195or for an alternative one if the former should be denied, the respondent having submitted an affidavit to the court that raised a material issue of fact, an order was granted directing the respondent to reinstate the petitioner as a teacher in the public schools of the city of Rochester forthwith or to show cause before me, an official referee, at a time designated in said order, why the peremptory mandate should not be obeyed, and to make return to the petition and order; the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. EmersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Matter of Burr v. . VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Matter of Levitch v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Matter of O'Connor v. . EmersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. People Ex Rel. Peixotto v. . Bd. of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gimprich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Monan v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Holm v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  4. McMaster v. OwensNew York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API