Commonwealth v. Leneski
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGelinas, J.
Joseph V. Leneski appeals from his conviction for larceny of property valued at over $250. On appeal, he claims (1) that the trial judge abused his discretion in admitting a “video CD” (compact disc or CD) of digitally recorded surveillance of a convenience store in which the defendant was working; (2) that the trial judge committed error in fading to give, sua sponte, a “limiting” instruction; and (3) that the CD should not have been admitted as its probative value was outweighed by its prejudicial effect.
*292Facts. Charles Mabardy, the owner of the Salisbury Mini-Mart (store) in Salisbury,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AustinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. NoxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Fauci v. MulreadyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Henderson v. D'ANNOLFO DODGE ELECTRICAL CONTRMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. CintronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Commonwealth v. AmaralMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Renzi v. ParedesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.