Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Leneski

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 15, 2006No. 04-P-1645PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGelinas, J.

Joseph V. Leneski appeals from his conviction for larceny of property valued at over $250. On appeal, he claims (1) that the trial judge abused his discretion in admitting a “video CD” (compact disc or CD) of digitally recorded surveillance of a convenience store in which the defendant was working; (2) that the trial judge committed error in fading to give, sua sponte, a “limiting” instruction; and (3) that the CD should not have been admitted as its probative value was outweighed by its prejudicial effect.

*292Facts. Charles Mabardy, the owner of the Salisbury Mini-Mart (store) in Salisbury,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AustinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. NoxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Fauci v. MulreadyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Henderson v. D'ANNOLFO DODGE ELECTRICAL CONTRMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. CintronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. AmaralMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
  4. People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Renzi v. ParedesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API