Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Austin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 15, 1995PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
A jury in the Superior Court convicted the defendant on an indictment charging him with armed assault with intent to rob. He was acquitted on an indictment charging him with armed assault with intent to murder. The defendant appealed. We granted his application for direct appellate review. He argues three claims of error. First, the defendant contends that his pretrial motion to suppress out-of-court identifications made by two eyewitnesses was improperly denied. Second, he argues that the trial judge erred in admitting in evidence a surveillance videotape of another robbery, allegedly…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. SturtivantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Commonwealth v. Colon-CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- United States v. JackmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. Silva-SantiagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.