Hopson v. Dinan
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. Garnishment. The garnishee brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtG-ravjcs, C. J.
In July, 1881, -one Frederick Speier «entered into a written contract with the defendant Dinan that he would erect three specified frame dwellings for Dinan and would “ well and sufficiently perform, finish and •complete all the work, included in the excavation, drain ■brick work, concreting, plastering, and all work included in and implied by mason’s specifications to plans ; also all carpenter and joiner work, iron and tin work, all plumbing and gas-fitting and painting and glazing, and all work indicated on and implied by plans and specifications for completion and entire finishing” of the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bethel v. ChipmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Walker v. Paramount Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Old Second National Bank v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Garland v. Sperling Bros.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1892
- Walker v. Paramount Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965