Legal Opinion
People v. Perez
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 12, 2018No. E060438PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRamirez, P. J.
*204A drug dealer identified only as "Max" owed money to a group of other drug dealers for some methamphetamine that had gone missing. He decided to ambush his creditors, tie them up, rob them of any drugs and money they might have, and kill them.
Max delegated the actual commission of these planned crimes to at least nine men. Some of them, including defendant Pablo Sandoval, worked for him; others, including defendant Edgar Ivan Chavez Navarro,1 worked for a fellow drug dealer named Eduardo Alvarado; and still others, including defendant Jose Luis Perez, worked for (or with) another drug dealer…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- The People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. Flint, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Blessett, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re Corpus, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Veamatahau, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.