Legal Opinion

Travis v. Bulifant

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 9, 1983No. Record 801355PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal from á decree dismissing a bill for accounting, the sole question is whether the complainants are barred from relief by the doctrine of Massie v. Firmstone, 134 Va. 450, 114 S.E. 652 (1922). Finding that they are, we affirm the decree.

Bulifant, Ludwig, and Travis formed a partnership, B.L.T. Associates, to build and operate the Chippenham Mall Shopping Center in Chesterfield County. Bulifant owned a 75% interest in the partnership and was to supervise construction. Travis, a real estate agent for 27 years, held a 12 ½% interest and was to handle the leasing and operation of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Massie v. FirmstoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. MabinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  4. Baines v. Parker and GladdingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  5. Saunders and Rittenhouse v. BulluckSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Shevel's, Inc. v. Southeastern Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. Olsten of Richmond v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  5. Hogan v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API