Legal Opinion

State v. Frazier

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 14, 2020No. 45/19PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Kaleem Michael Frazier, No. 45, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW—MERGER—FOURTH DEGREE SEXUAL OFFENSE— SECOND DEGREE ASSAULT The Court of Appeals held that, under the merger rule articulated in State v. Lancaster, 332 Md. 385,

631 A.2d 453

(1993), offenses and their sentences merge for purposes of sentencing. The Court declined to overturn Lancaster, citing principles of stare decisis. Departure from stare decisis should occur sparingly and is only warranted when precedent is “clearly wrong” or when it is plainly obvious that adherence to the decision…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Snowden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Small MS4 Coalition v. Dept. of EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Jarvis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  4. Koushall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Butler v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API