Legal Opinion

Lihosit v. I & W, INC.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1996No. 16285Published

1Opinion of the Court

913 P.2d 262 (1996)

121 N.M. 455

David F. LIHOSIT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

I & W, INC., A New Mexico Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16285.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

January 17, 1996.

Certiorari Denied March 6, 1996.

Perry C. Abernethy, Abernethy Law Office, P.C., Carlsbad, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Robert P. Tinnin, Jr., Paul G. Nason, Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley, P.L.L.C., Albuquerque, for Defendant-Appellee.

OPINION

BLACK, Judge.

David F. Lihosit (Lihosit) was employed as a truck driver by I & W, Inc. (I & W). In his complaint, Lihosit alleged I & W violated clear public policy by…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Texas Division-Tranter, Inc. v. CarrozzaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. Cloutier v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API