Clinton C. Quesenberry, s/k/a v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, Judge.
Clinton C. Quesenberry was convicted in a bench trial of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred by finding the plastic flare launcher he possessed was a “firearm” subject to the prohibition of Code § 18.2-308.2. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
BACKGROUND
“On appeal, “we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom.’ ” Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va.App. 1, 11, 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 (1997) (citation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Archer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Armstrong v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- Berry v. City of ChesapeakeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
- Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Alger v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morris v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- People v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025