Patel v. Fleming
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Kamal K. Patel (“Plaintiff’), a prisoner appearing pro se, brings suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging the conditions of his incarceration at two federal correctional facilities in Oklahoma. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court dismissing Plaintiffs suit based on his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. We DENY Plaintiffs motion to reconsider our order striking an issue related to a separate case that he raised in his opening brief. We also DENY as moot Plaintiffs motion to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David HautamakiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Jernigan v. StuchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gallagher v. SheltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Yu Kikumura v. OsagieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- CHELF v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
- Ellis v. VadlamudiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Galvez Piñeda v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.