Legal Opinion

Villafranca v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 28, 2009No. 08-10920PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Enrique Villafranca appeals the district court’s judgment, following a bench trial, that he take nothing on his assault and negligence claims against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The district court determined that the federal agents did not commit an assault against Villafranca because they used reasonable force to effect a lawful arrest. The district court also found that the agents’ alleged negligence was not the proximate cause of Villafranca’s injuries, and thus he did not have a viable claim for negligence. Because we hold…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Texas Department of Public Safety v. PettaTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hatahley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Brownback v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. Jose Davila v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. City of KyleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. John Hogan v. City of Corpus Christi, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  5. Martin v. HalliburtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API