Balkum v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SAMFORD, Judge.
The defendant was indicted on a charge that he did willfully set fire to, or burned, or caused to be burned, etc., a dwelling house, the property of Richard Flowers.
The ownership of the property was properly laid in Richard Flowers, the tenant. Faulk v. State, 23 Ala.App. 213, 123 So. 104; Adams et al. v. State, 62 Ala. 177. As to what business the tenant was engaged in at the time of the fire, as a means of livelihood, is immaterial, and the State’s objection to the question seeking to bring out this evidence, was free from error.-
The question propounded to the witness Cauley,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Winslow v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Lindsey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
- Balkum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939