Legal Opinion

Balkum v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1939No. 4 Div. 467PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The defendant was indicted on a charge that he did willfully set fire to, or burned, or caused to be burned, etc., a dwelling house, the property of Richard Flowers.

The ownership of the property was properly laid in Richard Flowers, the tenant. Faulk v. State, 23 Ala.App. 213, 123 So. 104; Adams et al. v. State, 62 Ala. 177. As to what business the tenant was engaged in at the time of the fire, as a means of livelihood, is immaterial, and the State’s objection to the question seeking to bring out this evidence, was free from error.-

The question propounded to the witness Cauley,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Winslow v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Lindsey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Balkum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API