Legal Opinion
Stone v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 15, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-1761PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FLANNERY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of defendants Pierce and Chisholm for judgment on the pleadings, the motion of defendant District of Columbia to dismiss, and on plaintiffs’ second motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motions are granted, plaintiffs’ motion is denied, and this case is dismissed.
Background
The United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1437a et seq., provides in part that tenants of public housing projects assisted under the Act shall pay as rent no more than 30 percent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Irma Howard v. Samuel Pierce, Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Grand Rapids Housing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Edwards v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Service Employees International Union, Local 82 v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Beckham v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Baum v. EspyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.