Legal Opinion

Baum v. Espy

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 13, 1993No. 5:88 CV 0234PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DOWD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On November 16, 1992, 1 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded this Court’s prior decision wherein summary judgment had been granted to the plaintiffs on the ground that 7 U.S.C. § 2014(d)(1) required exclusion of utility reimbursements (“UR”) from income for purposes of determining food stamp eligibility. 2 See Baum v. Madigan, 979 F.2d 438 (6th Cir.1992). The Sixth Circuit instructed this Court to enter judgment for the defendants on that issue, Baum v. Madigan, 979 F.2d at 443, and noted that issues raised…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re YoungUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API