Legal Opinion
Fogle v. Ramsey Winch Co., Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 20, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-866 (CRR)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the defendant Ramsey Winch Co.’s (“Ramsey”) Motion to Quash Service and to Dismiss Due to Lack of Jurisdiction, and Motion to Transfer Venue, plaintiffs’ Opposition thereto, defendants’ Reply, and Supplemental Memoranda submitted by both plaintiffs and defendants in the above-captioned action. Defendants argue that they lack the minimum contacts with the District of Columbia (“District”) necessary to subject them to personal jurisdiction in the District under the constitutional requirements of due process and the District…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Laura Ann Vermeulen v. Renault, U.S.A., Inc., Regie Nationale Des Usines RenaultCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Vermeulen v. Renault U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Ex Parte Duck Boo Intern. Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Vermeulen v. Renault, U.S.A. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Burman v. Phoenix Worldwide Industries, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.