Legal Opinion
Burman v. Phoenix Worldwide Industries, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 7, 2006No. Civil Action 04-1276 (RBW)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Paul I. Burman, Robert C. Warriner, Sylvia J. Rolinski, and the Ingersoll & Bloch, Chartered, Employees Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, bring this action to recover compensatory damages for injuries caused by alleged “statutory securities fraud, common law fraud and misrepresentation, negligent representation, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence” on the part of the defendants, Phoenix Worldwide Industries, Inc. (“Phoenix”), Dr. J. A1 Esquivel Shuler (“Shuler”), and Rachlin, Cohen & Holtz, LLP (“Rachlin”). Second Amended Complaint…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mwani, Odilla Mutaka v. Bin Ladin, UsamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Kent B. Crane v. New York Zoological SocietyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- The Urban Institute v. Fincon ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Lewy v. Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Kimball Union Academy v. GenovesiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Loreto v. CushmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Angel's Dream, LLC v. Toledo Jet Center, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.