Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Lasswell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1955No. 7340PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Judge.

Because of1 an auto-truck collision plaintiff sued for damage, in the first count, for his own injuries and for injuries to and consequent medical expense and loss of services of his wife in the sum of $7,500 and, in the second count, for property damage of $1,100. The total, prayed for was $8,600. Defendant responded with answer and counterclaim growing out of the same collision, claiming $2,500 personal injuries and $1,000 property damage. On jury trial the verdict was, “We, the jury, find the issues for the defendant, Lee Lasswell, on both counts of plaintiff’s petition, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brunson Const. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Heuer v. UlmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Shumate Ex Rel. Shumate v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  4. Lemonds Ex Rel. Lemonds v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Hoefel v. HammelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Palmer v. LasswellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. City of Olivette v. GraelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Webb v. HarringtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Albers Milling Co. v. CarneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Harmon v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API