Thompson v. . Buchanan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaRicsoN, J.
The first main proposition to be determined: Should the demurrer of plaintiffs to the counterclaim of defendants be sustained? We think so. The law in regard to “Slander of property” is stated in Newell Slander and Libel, 4th ed., part sec. 160, p. 196, as follows: “It permits an action to be brought against anyone who falsely and maliciously defames property, either real or personal, of another, and thereby causes him some special pecuniary damage or loss. As in all other actions dependent upon special damages there must be injury, and damage, the injurious words falsely and maliciously…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nicholson v. Eureka Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Gibson v. . BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Byerly v. . HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Yellowday v. . PerkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Cohoon v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hancammon v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McKay v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Taylor v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Owens v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Owens v. Blackwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.