Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brush v. Klauck

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1984No. 14111Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

Auen, 342 N.W.2d 236 (S.D.1984), modified State v. Wikle, 291 N.W.2d 792 (S.D. 1980). In Wikle, 291 N.W.2d at 794, we expressed:

We take this opportunity, however, to express approval of the position espoused in the special concurring opinions in [City of Brookings v.'] Roberts [88 S.D. 623, 226 N.W.2d 380 (1975) ] to the effect that in any criminal prosecution, whether for violation of state law or city ordinance, in which a direct penalty of incarceration for any period of time could be imposed, the accused is entitled to trial by jury upon demand. See Baker v. City of Fairbanks, 471 P.2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lapp v. City of WorlandWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. AuenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. WikleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API