Hicks ex rel. Maize v. Shanabarger
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMcDOWELL, J.
Action for damages. The petition was in two counts. The answer was a general denial and a counterclaim based upon primary negligence and the humanitarian doctrine. The cause was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of plaintiff, Hicks, for personal injuries in the sum of $1,000.00, and on the second count, in favor of plaintiff, Maize, for property damage in the sum *480of $600.00. Judgment was entered by the court accordingly. Motion for new trial was, by the court, sustained and plaintiffs appeal.
Plaintiff, Carl Hicks, -a minor, brought his action in the name of J. H. Maize, as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Castorina v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Menard v. GoltraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Parkell v. FitzporterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- Teague v. Plaza Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Donati v. GualdoniSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. Flex-O-Lite Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Oventrop v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Moore v. MorantMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Beulah Wichmann v. United Disposal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Brady v. Black and White Cab CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.