Legal Opinion

Hicks ex rel. Maize v. Shanabarger

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDOWELL, J.

Action for damages. The petition was in two counts. The answer was a general denial and a counterclaim based upon primary negligence and the humanitarian doctrine. The cause was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of plaintiff, Hicks, for personal injuries in the sum of $1,000.00, and on the second count, in favor of plaintiff, Maize, for property damage in the sum *480of $600.00. Judgment was entered by the court accordingly. Motion for new trial was, by the court, sustained and plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiff, Carl Hicks, -a minor, brought his action in the name of J. H. Maize, as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Castorina v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Menard v. GoltraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Parkell v. FitzporterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  4. Teague v. Plaza Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. Donati v. GualdoniSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Flex-O-Lite Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Oventrop v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Moore v. MorantMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Beulah Wichmann v. United Disposal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. Brady v. Black and White Cab CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API