Legal Opinion

Ackerhalt v. Hanline Brothers

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 1, 1969No. [No. 164, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

As the late William Schwenck Gilbert put it, “Here’s a pretty kettle of fish.” 1 The appellant (Ackerhalt) tells us the trial judge (Mathias, J.) 2 erred when he directed a verdict which set at naught an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission, dated 2 February 1967, declaring that Ackerhalt had sustained an accidental injury on 24 March 1966 and awarding him compensation therefor. In our recital of this extraordinary affair we shall be at all times mindful of the familiar rule that the evidence and all logical and reasonable inferences deducible therefrom must be considered in a light…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williams Construction Co. v. BohlenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. P. Flanigan & Sons, Inc. v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Williams v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Blake Construction Co. v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Trusty v. WoodenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Coffey v. Derby Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Baltimore County v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane v. TornilloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Wooddy v. MuddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Board of Education v. SpradlinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API