Legal Opinion

Wesley v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Henry Wesley against the city of Detroit for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff .brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, C. J.

I think the court was correct in directing a verdict. The sidewalk was in a condition in which the city had a right to leave it. If there had been a plank or stone walk of the same incline as the ground, it would have been equally, if not more, dangerous. It was not unsafe or dangerous in its original condition. It was made unsafe solely by the accumulation of ice and snow. *659Sidewalks and streets must have inclines, and, whatever may be the decisions of the courts of other States, it is settled in this State that municipalities are not liable for accidents caused by the natural accumulations…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gavett v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hutchinson v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Salvati v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Johnson v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Hampton v. Master Products, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Hopson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Mendyk v. Michigan Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API