Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Pontiac

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1936No. Docket No. 76, Calendar No. 38,807PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnell, J.

The trial judge having reserved decision under the provisions of 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 14531, on defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, entered a judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict, the jury having found for plaintiff in the sum of $8,375. Plaintiff appeals.

On December 9, 1933, Mrs. Johnson suffered severe injuries as the result of a fall sustained while walking over or around a piéce of defective sidewalk near her home. The accident happened in the daytime and in the presence of a neighbor who had accompanied her down town. The day was clear, but it had snowed the previous…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rice v. Goodspeed Real Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Lawrence v. Bartling & Dull Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Evans v. OrttenburgerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Vergin v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hopson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Davidson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Plunkett v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Hampton v. Master Products, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API