Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. Barrow

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 1928No. 1634PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

On the trial of this case to a .jury, appellees, W. R. Holton and his wife, Kate Holton, recovered a" judgment against appellants for an undivided interest of 160 acres in the lower Henry Dainwood survey in Jasper county. By agreement, the record title was in appellants. Their propositions here go only to the extent of challenging the verdict of the jury on the issue of ten years’ limitation as being without support in the evidence. These propositions are based on the refusal of the trial court to instruct a verdict in their behalf, and are as follows:(1) There was no evidence of ten years’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Odem v. LeahyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Stevenson v. BarrowTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  4. Stevenson v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Stevenson v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. BarrowTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Wiggins v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API