Legal Opinion

In Re Rash

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1943No. 7081PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

An information charging bigamy was filed against petitioner November 24, 1941. Thereafter, at a trial on said charge, in December, 1941, the jury disagreed. January 5, 1942, the case was continued at defendant’s request because of the absence of, and inability to secure, necessary witnesses. September 19, 1942, the case was continued at the request of the prosecution, based upon this statement by the trial court:

“That this court takes judicial notice of. the fact that the United States is at war and that it would be virtually impossible to obtain witnesses in said cause at the present time…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Clyde MeadowsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. State v. BatehamOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. ChadwickOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. In Re CressWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lee Lim v. Davis, WardenUtah Supreme Court · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. EstencionHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. LewisIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ellenwood v. CramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. EikelbergerIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State v. NaccaratoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API