Legal Opinion

State v. Dula

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1984No. 8325SC358PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

In her first assignment of error, the defendant contends it was error not to dismiss the charges against her. She argues that there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find that Ramona F. Barlow occupied the apartment and that the defendant did not have consent to enter the apartment. The indictment alleged that Ramona Barlow occupied the apartment. The evidence showed that Miss Barlow’s sister had leased the apartment and Miss Barlow paid the rent on it and lived there. We believe this evidence shows she occupied the apartment. Occupancy of the *750premises is not made an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. BassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FronebergerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. Palmer P.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  4. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. DulaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API