Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 27, 1996No. 248, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal from the Superior Court, the appellant, Caleb Moore (“Moore”), challenges that court’s order of restitution in connection with his sentencing after convictions of burglary in the second degree and conspiracy in the second degree. Specifically, Moore alleges that the trial court exceeded its statutory authority in ordering restitution and denied Moore due process in setting the amount of restitution. We find no merit in these contentions and accordingly affirm the decision of the Superior Court.

I

Debra Stigars (“Stigars”) reported to police that her house in Kent County, Delaware *172…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter E. Brewer and Brian E. HonelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. MathisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Pratt v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. People v. HouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Benton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. Palmer P.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. State v. BrookeDelaware Family Court · 2009
  4. State v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API