Legal Opinion

United States v. Gerald Lee Eastman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 22, 1985No. 83-1226PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

STEPHENS, Senior District Judge.

Eastman appeals from a district court order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35. Appellant contends that the judge considered hearsay in denying his motion and failed to fully consider his arguments at the hearing of the motion. There is no showing that the judge abused his discretion in denying the motion under Rule 35(b).

Gerald Eastman pled guilty to one count of violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314, transportation of stolen monies known to be taken by fraud, and to two counts of violation of 15 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Wayne Wilburn MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Joe Clark ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Setser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. United States v. Timothy Curtis BallardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Yussel Brody, A/K/A "Joseph Brody,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API