Fragomeni v. Otto Gratzol Signs, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Royse, J.
In its petition for rehearing appellee calls to our attention a wholly incorrect statement in our original opinion. In that opinion this writer stated: “The record further discloses appellee was in default in the payment of rent due for the original term.” This was not true inasmuch as no time was specified in the lease as to when the rent should be paid. This writer misconstrued the letter set out in the original opinion as a demand for rent of the property involved in this action, when in fact it referred to another parcel of real estate. This misstatement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thiebaud v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Montgomery v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Falley v. GilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- C. Callahan Co. v. MichaelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
- Remm v. LandonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carsten v. EickhoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Norris Avenue Professional Building Partnership v. Coordinated Health, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015