Legal Opinion

Rivera v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur W. Lonschein, J.

In this action for injuries to a child, a settlement was reached in November 1987, but has not yet been fully paid. The plaintiff now moves for the imposition of interest, punitive damages, and counsel fees. For the reasons stated below, interest is warranted, but punitive damages and counsel fees are not.

An infant’s compromise order was not presented until May 1988, and was signed on June 16, 1988. This order provided, inter alia, for the payment of $75,000 "to Louise Roach to be *136used for the sole use and benefit of the infant plaintiff, Janine…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Rochester Carting Co. v. LevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Juracka v. FerraraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Pollock v. CollippAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Craft Architectural Metals Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
  2. Martin v. TafflockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API